Welcome to the CSCL2009 dialog blog!

It is our great pleasure to welcome you on the CSCL2009 pre-conference dialogue blog!

The purpose of the blog is to facilitate the dialogue between the authors and other participants of the conference, before, during and after CSCL 2009 conference. There is a post –containing the abstract along with a link to the full text- for every paper that will be presented at the conference. You can view the abstract of a paper, read the full text, post your comments and/or questions, exchange ideas…

Tags associated with the types of the papers have been assigned to the relative posts so that you have the choice of filtering the content you want to read. Just click on a tag and all posts concerning the papers of the corresponding category will be displayed on the main blog’s page. You can then scroll through the posts of this certain category until you find the one(s) you are interested in. All tags are displayed in the tags block on the right column of the blog’s page.

The meanings of the tags are described here below:

(a) Regarding the paper category:

  • ΑF (full papers)
  • AFI (full papers that will be presented in interactive format)
  • API (short papers that will be presented in interactive format)
  • AS (short papers)
  • ASP (posters)

(b) Regarding award nominees:

  • BPN (Best Paper Nominee)
  • BSPN (Best Student Paper Nominee)
  • BTDN (Best Technology Design Nominee)

(c) Regarding the conference sessions:

  • PS_1: Analyzing Group Cognition in CSCL Practises
  • PS_2: Scripts & Scaffolds
  • PS_3: Argumentation & Problem Based Learning
  • PS_4: Tabletops and tangibles
  • PS_5: Teacher Professional Development & Communities of Practice
  • PS_6: Discussion & Conflict Resolution
  • PS_7: Approaches to Analyzing Interaction
  • PS_8: Games and Simulations
  • PS_9: Evaluating Computer-Mediated Learning
  • PS_10: Knowledge Building & Virtual Learning Environments
  • PS_11: Science Education & Problem Based Learning
  • PS_12: Learning Processes & Games
  • PS_13: Handhelds & mCSCL
  • PS_14: Scripts & Adaptation
  • PS_15: Mathematics & Science Education
  • PS_16: Case studies in Higher Education
  • PS_17: Data Mining and Process Analysis
  • PS_18: Shared displays & workspaces
  • PS_19: Social Software/wikis
  • PS_20: Professional Development
  • PS_21: : Peer Awareness for Assessment, Coaching & Coordination
  • PS_22: Web 2.0, Wikis & Knowledge building
  • PS_23: Awareness & Self regulation
  • PS_24: Knowledge Construction & Gaming Practices

Alternatively, you could also search for a paper arbitrarily, by entering a part of its title, or the author/s name in the search box provided at the top of the blog’s page.

Posting of comments is allowed for registered users only. You will therefore be prompted to give an e-mail address each time you post a comment.

Use RSS or Atom Syndication to get the newer comments immediately for the full blog, or a specific tag, or a specific post-paper :

Comments-only feed

Atom 1.0: http://cscl2009.blogspot.com/feeds/comments/default

RSS 2.0: http://cscl2009.blogspot.com/feeds/comments/default?alt=rss

Label-specific site feed:

Atom 1.0: http://cscl2009.blogspot.com/posts/comments/default/-/labelname
RSS 2.0: http://cscl2009.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss/-/labelname


Individual post comment feed:

Atom 1.0: http://cscl2009.blogspot.com/feeds/postId/comments/default
RSS 2.0: http://cscl2009.blogspot.com/feeds/postId/comments/default?alt=rss

Hoping you will enjoy the blog …




    Showing posts with label PS_16. Show all posts
    Showing posts with label PS_16. Show all posts

    The Effects of Corrected-Errors in Asynchronous Video Based Lessons on Task Efficiency

    • Antonios Saravanos , Columbia University
    • Seungoh Paek , Columbia University
    • Jin Kuwata , Columbia University
    • Alexandra Saravanos , Columbia University
    This study explores the impact that student exposure to instructor made corrected-errors can have on their pedagogy through the use of asynchronous video-based lessons. We define corrected-errors as segments in the lesson where the instructor makes an error, identifies that an error has been made, and then goes on to correct it. Our study measures the learners' performance on a similar task by looking at the efficiency in which that task is carried out. We hypothesize that the modeling of error detection and correction skills when coupled with the instructor’s explicit meta-cognitive explanation and reflection of errors, will lead to an increase in efficiency.
    Full text in PDF

    Does social software fit for all? Examining students’ profiles and activities in collaborative learning mediated by social software

    • Jari Laru , LET – Learning & Educational Technology Research Unit, University of Oulu, Snellmania, Finland
    • Piia Näykki , LET – Learning & Educational Technology Research Unit, University of Oulu, Snellmania, Finland
    • Sanna Järvelä , LET – Learning & Educational Technology Research Unit, University of Oulu, Snellmania, Finland
    In this study the dependencies between higher education students’ profiles, activities, and learning outcomes in collaborative learning -- as mediated by social software -- were examined. Although the sample size in this study was small (n=22), Bayesian Dependency Modeling method provided statistically viable insight. The results show that learners who were active reflectors in their blogs, but who were also interested in what others achieved, obtained the best results in knowledge tests. Based on the analysis, two distinct learner profiles that reflect differences in the students’ dependencies can be distinguished: monitor and reflector. Furthermore, an indirect dependencies found in the analysis suggests that both reflectors and monitors are also active wiki editors and participants in face-to-face discussions. Further qualitative analyses are needed in order to get an in-depth view of the complex interactions and dependencies within and between the face-to-face and virtual, but also individual and social, planes of collaboration.
    Full text in PDF

    Working collaboratively in small groups supported by KnowCat System: incidence on self-regulated learning processes

    • Manoli Pifarré , Universitat de Lleida
    • Ruth Cobos , Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
    The aim of this research study was to examine the development of higher students’ self-regulated processes after their participation in a specific CSCL system called KnowCat. Twenty-six university students participated in a 6-month learning project. During this period KnowCat learning environment was used to support scaffolding process among students in small group collaborative work. In the research study students’ scaffolding processes in the different small groups were analyzed qualitatively. The results obtained in this study showed small group interaction patterns appeared while their members were working together throughout the instructional process supported by KnowCat. These interaction patters were related with an increasing number of self-regulated processes, specially planning, asking for clarification and monitoring skills.
    Full text in PDF

    When Is Collaborating With Friends A Good Idea? Insights From Design Education

    • Heidy Maldonado , Stanford University
    • Scott Klemmer , Stanford University
    • Roy Pea , Stanford University
    Prior research is split on the relationship between prior friendship and performance. Based on our review of the literature, we highlight areas where further research is needed to achieve greater practical applicability of the results. We then present our study measures and preliminary analysis of data collected from a design studio university course. Our quantitative and qualitative probes suggest a link between teammates’ prior friendship and lower performance outcomes. We also identify four group processes that may mediate the relationship between friendship and performance.
    Full text in PDF

    A context for collaboration: Institutions and the infrastructure for learning

    • Christopher Jones , Open University
    This paper discusses the role of institutional issues in the deployment of infrastructures for learning and the ways in which they can impact on the range of choices and opportunities for collaboration in university education. The paper is based on interviews with 12 key informants selected from relevant staff categories during the deployment of a new institutional infrastructure in a large UK based distance learning university. It is supplemented by participant observation by the author who was part of a group of advisors tasked with working with the project team developing and deploying the new infrastructure. The paper investigates the development and deployment of the infrastructure as a meso level phenomena and relates this feature to the discussion of emergence and supervenience as features of social interactions in education.
    Full text in PDF

    Collaboration and the Net generation: The changing characteristics of first year university students

    • Christopher Jones , Open University
    • Ruslan Ramanau , Open University
    This paper reports on the first phase of research that investigates the Net generation entering university. The paper focuses on claims about the Net generation’s relationship to collaboration and cooperation and the ways that this relationship is associated with technological rather than social processes. Based on a survey of first year students in five universities across a range of subjects and disciplinary areas, the paper concludes that we should be cautious about the claims that have been made about Net generation learners. It suggests that broad brush approaches to generational changes obscure the subtle but important differences between students. It also suggests that claims that there has been a step change in attitudes takes attention away from the kinds of choices that might be necessary in relation to variations that are indeed taking place amongst new cohorts of students.
    Full text in PDF